public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex acquire in amdgpu_devcoredump_format
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 20:17:40 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520151741.50575-3-mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520151741.50575-1-mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>

When dumping IB contents from a hung job, amdgpu_devcoredump_format()
acquired the VM root PD's reservation via amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() and
then, for each IB, called amdgpu_bo_reserve() on the BO backing the IB.
Both reservations are reservation_ww_class_mutex objects and neither
used a ww_acquire_ctx, which trips lockdep:

  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  --------------------------------------------
  kworker/u128:0 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88838b16e1f0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4},
    at: amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594/0x23f0 [amdgpu]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff8882f82681f0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4},
    at: amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594/0x23f0 [amdgpu]

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
         CPU0
         ----
    lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
    lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***
   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  Workqueue: events_unbound amdgpu_devcoredump_deferred_work [amdgpu]
  Call Trace:
   __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0
   ww_mutex_lock
   amdgpu_bo_reserve
   amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594 [amdgpu]
   amdgpu_devcoredump_deferred_work+0xea [amdgpu]

The two reservations are on different BOs in the captured trace, so the
splat is a lockdep-correctness warning, not an observed deadlock. It
becomes a real self-deadlock whenever the IB BO shares its dma_resv with
the root PD (the always-valid case, see amdgpu_vm_is_bo_always_valid()):
amdgpu_bo_reserve(abo) re-acquires the same ww_mutex without a ticket
and blocks forever.

With amdgpu.gpu_recovery=0 the timeout handler refires every ~2 s and
each invocation produces this splat, drowning the kernel ring buffer.

Now that amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() takes a drm_exec context, lock the
root PD and every IB BO together in a single drm_exec ticket.
DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES handles IB BOs that share a dma_resv (e.g.
always-valid BOs, or two IBs backed by the same BO). Every lock is now
a top-level acquire under one ww_acquire_ctx, so the recursive ww_mutex
condition is gone, and the per-IB amdgpu_bo_reserve()/amdgpu_bo_unref()
dance -- including a BO refcount leak on the amdgpu_bo_reserve() failure
path -- is removed.

Reproducer (~150 LoC libdrm_amdgpu): submit a single GFX IB containing
PACKET3_INDIRECT_BUFFER chained at GPU VA 0 and wait for the fence. The
TDR fires within ~10 s and the deferred coredump worker produces the
splat above on every invocation; with this change applied the splat is
gone.

Fixes: 7b15fc2d1f1a ("drm/amdgpu: dump job ibs in the devcoredump")
Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.c  | 103 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.c
index d386bc775d03..a9d8e03fad83 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dev_coredump.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 
 #include <generated/utsrelease.h>
 #include <linux/devcoredump.h>
+#include <drm/drm_exec.h>
 #include "amdgpu_dev_coredump.h"
 #include "atom.h"
 
@@ -214,13 +215,9 @@ amdgpu_devcoredump_format(char *buffer, size_t count, struct amdgpu_coredump_inf
 	struct drm_printer p;
 	struct drm_print_iterator iter;
 	struct amdgpu_vm_fault_info *fault_info;
-	struct amdgpu_bo_va_mapping *mapping;
 	struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block;
 	struct amdgpu_res_cursor cursor;
-	struct amdgpu_bo *abo, *root;
-	uint64_t va_start, offset;
 	struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
-	struct amdgpu_vm *vm;
 	u32 *ib_content;
 	uint8_t *kptr;
 	int ver, i, j, r;
@@ -343,43 +340,84 @@ amdgpu_devcoredump_format(char *buffer, size_t count, struct amdgpu_coredump_inf
 		drm_printf(&p, "VRAM is lost due to GPU reset!\n");
 
 	if (coredump->num_ibs) {
-		/* Don't try to lookup the VM or map the BOs when calculating the
-		 * size required to store the devcoredump.
+		struct amdgpu_bo_va_mapping *mapping;
+		struct amdgpu_bo *root, *abo;
+		struct drm_exec exec;
+		struct amdgpu_vm *vm;
+		u64 va_start, offset;
+		bool locked = false;
+
+		/*
+		 * Lock the VM root PD and every IB BO together in a single
+		 * drm_exec ticket. Reserving the IB BOs one by one while the
+		 * root PD is held would be a recursive reservation_ww_class_mutex
+		 * acquire without a ww_acquire_ctx, which trips lockdep and
+		 * self-deadlocks for IB BOs that share their dma_resv with the
+		 * root PD (always-valid BOs).
+		 *
+		 * Skip locking entirely on the sizing pass: it does not write
+		 * IB content, so the size estimate doesn't depend on whether
+		 * the BOs are reachable.
 		 */
-		if (sizing_pass)
-			vm = NULL;
-		else
-			vm = amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid(adev, &root, coredump->pasid);
+		if (!sizing_pass) {
+			drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES,
+				      1 + coredump->num_ibs);
+			drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
+				vm = amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid(adev, &root,
+							     coredump->pasid, &exec);
+				drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+				if (!vm)
+					break;
+
+				for (int i = 0; i < coredump->num_ibs; i++) {
+					u64 pfn;
+
+					va_start = coredump->ibs[i].gpu_addr &
+						   AMDGPU_GMC_HOLE_MASK;
+					pfn = va_start / AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE;
+					mapping = amdgpu_vm_bo_lookup_mapping(vm, pfn);
+					if (!mapping)
+						continue;
+
+					abo = mapping->bo_va->base.bo;
+					r = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec, &abo->tbo.base);
+					drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+					if (r)
+						break;
+				}
+				if (r)
+					break;
+			}
+			if (vm && !r)
+				locked = true;
+			else
+				drm_exec_fini(&exec);
+		}
+
+		for (int i = 0; i < coredump->num_ibs; i++) {
+			bool emit_content = sizing_pass;
 
-		for (int i = 0; i < coredump->num_ibs && (sizing_pass || vm); i++) {
 			ib_content = kvmalloc_array(coredump->ibs[i].ib_size_dw, 4,
 						    GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!ib_content)
 				continue;
 
-			/* vm=NULL can only happen when 'sizing_pass' is true. Skip to the
-			 * drm_printf() calls (ib_content doesn't need to be initialized
-			 * as its content won't be written anywhere).
-			 */
-			if (!vm)
+			if (!locked)
 				goto output_ib_content;
 
 			va_start = coredump->ibs[i].gpu_addr & AMDGPU_GMC_HOLE_MASK;
 			mapping = amdgpu_vm_bo_lookup_mapping(vm, va_start / AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE);
 			if (!mapping)
-				goto free_ib_content;
+				goto output_ib_content;
 
-			offset = va_start - (mapping->start * AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE);
-			abo = amdgpu_bo_ref(mapping->bo_va->base.bo);
-			r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(abo, false);
-			if (r)
-				goto free_ib_content;
+			abo = mapping->bo_va->base.bo;
+			offset = va_start - mapping->start * AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE;
 
 			if (abo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_NO_CPU_ACCESS) {
 				off = 0;
 
 				if (abo->tbo.resource->mem_type != TTM_PL_VRAM)
-					goto unreserve_abo;
+					goto output_ib_content;
 
 				amdgpu_res_first(abo->tbo.resource, offset,
 						 coredump->ibs[i].ib_size_dw * 4,
@@ -391,12 +429,13 @@ amdgpu_devcoredump_format(char *buffer, size_t count, struct amdgpu_coredump_inf
 					off += cursor.size;
 					amdgpu_res_next(&cursor, cursor.size);
 				}
+				emit_content = true;
 			} else {
 				r = ttm_bo_kmap(&abo->tbo, 0,
 						PFN_UP(abo->tbo.base.size),
 						&abo->kmap);
 				if (r)
-					goto unreserve_abo;
+					goto output_ib_content;
 
 				kptr = amdgpu_bo_kptr(abo);
 				kptr += offset;
@@ -404,21 +443,21 @@ amdgpu_devcoredump_format(char *buffer, size_t count, struct amdgpu_coredump_inf
 				       coredump->ibs[i].ib_size_dw * 4);
 
 				amdgpu_bo_kunmap(abo);
+				emit_content = true;
 			}
 
 output_ib_content:
 			drm_printf(&p, "\nIB #%d 0x%llx %d dw\n",
 				   i, coredump->ibs[i].gpu_addr, coredump->ibs[i].ib_size_dw);
-			for (int j = 0; j < coredump->ibs[i].ib_size_dw; j++)
-				drm_printf(&p, "0x%08x\n", ib_content[j]);
-unreserve_abo:
-			if (vm)
-				amdgpu_bo_unreserve(abo);
-free_ib_content:
+			if (emit_content) {
+				for (int j = 0; j < coredump->ibs[i].ib_size_dw; j++)
+					drm_printf(&p, "0x%08x\n", ib_content[j]);
+			}
 			kvfree(ib_content);
 		}
-		if (vm) {
-			amdgpu_bo_unreserve(root);
+
+		if (locked) {
+			drm_exec_fini(&exec);
 			amdgpu_bo_unref(&root);
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-20 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-29 14:37 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex acquire in amdgpu_devcoredump_format Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-05  1:32 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-05  1:32 ` Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-19 13:05 ` [PATCH] " Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-19 13:47   ` Christian König
2026-05-19 16:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-20  7:08   ` Christian König
2026-05-20  8:07     ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-20 11:01       ` Christian König
2026-05-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex in devcoredump IB dump Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-20 15:17   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-21  8:31     ` Christian König
2026-05-20 15:17   ` Mikhail Gavrilov [this message]
2026-05-21  9:45     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex acquire in amdgpu_devcoredump_format kernel test robot
2026-05-21 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 0/2] drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex in devcoredump IB dump Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-21 10:43     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-21 12:39       ` Christian König
2026-05-21 10:43     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex acquire in amdgpu_devcoredump_format Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-21 15:08     ` [PATCH v5 0/2] drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex in devcoredump IB dump Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-21 15:08       ` [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/amdgpu: convert amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() to drm_exec Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-21 15:08       ` [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex acquire in amdgpu_devcoredump_format Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-22  8:08         ` Christian König
2026-05-22  8:31           ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-05-25  9:53   ` Claude review: drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex in devcoredump IB dump Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260520151741.50575-3-mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com \
    --to=mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox