From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Leonardo Cesar <leonardocesar@usp.br>,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: deduplicate ring preempt ib function
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:55:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_MGRpNE8Ge_5=w5mQDJivdS2Wt_2LD=dR-mrWH89Yc-0A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59b686c6-42f5-4cde-8199-dae64722bfd1@amd.com>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 3:09 AM Christian König
<christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/21/26 22:03, Leonardo Cesar wrote:
> > The ring preemption function is identical for both gfx_v11_0 and
> > gfx_v12_0. This patch refactors the code by moving the core logic
> > into a generic function inside amdgpu_gfx.c to reduce code
> > duplication and simplify future maintenance.
>
> Yeah that one looks reasonable. As far as I can see there isn't anything HW generation specific in the function.
>
> Question is rather why we have that for gfx12 in the first place. @Alex IIRC we support preemption only for a very narrow use case on gfx11, could that just be accidentially be copied over?
>
Yeah, probably just copy and pasted over when we brought up gfx12.
Alex
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Cesar <leonardocesar@usp.br>
> >
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Removed wrapper functions for gfx_v11 and gfx_v12 and updated call sites directly.
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c | ...
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c | 52 +------------------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c | 52 +------------------------
> > 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> > index 2956e45c9..a157cbd8e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> > @@ -2684,3 +2684,54 @@ void amdgpu_debugfs_compute_sched_mask_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > +int amdgpu_gfx_ring_preempt_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> > +{
> > + int i, r = 0;
>
> Just a style nit: Variables like "i" or "r" last please and don't initialize vairables like "r" while defining it.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> > + struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> > + struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq[0];
> > + struct amdgpu_ring *kiq_ring = &kiq->ring;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + if (adev->enable_mes)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!kiq->pmf || !kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (amdgpu_ring_alloc(kiq_ring, kiq->pmf->unmap_queues_size)) {
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* assert preemption condition */
> > + amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, false);
> > +
> > + /* assert IB preemption, emit the trailing fence */
> > + kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues(kiq_ring, ring, PREEMPT_QUEUES_NO_UNMAP,
> > + ring->trail_fence_gpu_addr,
> > + ++ring->trail_seq);
> > + amdgpu_ring_commit(kiq_ring);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /* poll the trailing fence */
> > + for (i = 0; i < adev->usec_timeout; i++) {
> > + if (ring->trail_seq ==
> > + le32_to_cpu(*(ring->trail_fence_cpu_addr)))
> > + break;
> > + udelay(1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (i >= adev->usec_timeout) {
> > + r = -EINVAL;
> > + DRM_ERROR("ring %d failed to preempt ib\n", ring->idx);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* deassert preemption condition */
> > + amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, true);
> > + return r;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> > index a0cf0a3b4..77050f988 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> > @@ -664,6 +664,8 @@ void amdgpu_gfx_csb_preamble_end(u32 *buffer, u32 count);
> > void amdgpu_debugfs_gfx_sched_mask_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> > void amdgpu_debugfs_compute_sched_mask_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> >
> > +int amdgpu_gfx_ring_preempt_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
> > +
> > static inline const char *amdgpu_gfx_compute_mode_desc(int mode)
> > {
> > switch (mode) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> > index 5097de940..1ba848bfa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> > @@ -6206,56 +6206,6 @@ static void gfx_v11_0_ring_emit_gfx_shadow(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> > ring->set_q_mode_offs = offs;
> > }
> >
> > -static int gfx_v11_0_ring_preempt_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> > -{
> > - int i, r = 0;
> > - struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> > - struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq[0];
> > - struct amdgpu_ring *kiq_ring = &kiq->ring;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > - if (adev->enable_mes)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - if (!kiq->pmf || !kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > -
> > - if (amdgpu_ring_alloc(kiq_ring, kiq->pmf->unmap_queues_size)) {
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* assert preemption condition */
> > - amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, false);
> > -
> > - /* assert IB preemption, emit the trailing fence */
> > - kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues(kiq_ring, ring, PREEMPT_QUEUES_NO_UNMAP,
> > - ring->trail_fence_gpu_addr,
> > - ++ring->trail_seq);
> > - amdgpu_ring_commit(kiq_ring);
> > -
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > -
> > - /* poll the trailing fence */
> > - for (i = 0; i < adev->usec_timeout; i++) {
> > - if (ring->trail_seq ==
> > - le32_to_cpu(*(ring->trail_fence_cpu_addr)))
> > - break;
> > - udelay(1);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (i >= adev->usec_timeout) {
> > - r = -EINVAL;
> > - DRM_ERROR("ring %d failed to preempt ib\n", ring->idx);
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* deassert preemption condition */
> > - amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, true);
> > - return r;
> > -}
> > -
> > static void gfx_v11_0_ring_emit_de_meta(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, bool resume)
> > {
> > struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> > @@ -7295,7 +7245,7 @@ static const struct amdgpu_ring_funcs gfx_v11_0_ring_funcs_gfx = {
> > .emit_cntxcntl = gfx_v11_0_ring_emit_cntxcntl,
> > .emit_gfx_shadow = gfx_v11_0_ring_emit_gfx_shadow,
> > .init_cond_exec = gfx_v11_0_ring_emit_init_cond_exec,
> > - .preempt_ib = gfx_v11_0_ring_preempt_ib,
> > + .preempt_ib = amdgpu_gfx_ring_preempt_ib,
> > .emit_frame_cntl = gfx_v11_0_ring_emit_frame_cntl,
> > .emit_wreg = gfx_v11_0_ring_emit_wreg,
> > .emit_reg_wait = gfx_v11_0_ring_emit_reg_wait,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> > index 65c33823a..6cf244349 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> > @@ -4611,56 +4611,6 @@ static unsigned gfx_v12_0_ring_emit_init_cond_exec(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static int gfx_v12_0_ring_preempt_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> > -{
> > - int i, r = 0;
> > - struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> > - struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq[0];
> > - struct amdgpu_ring *kiq_ring = &kiq->ring;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > - if (adev->enable_mes)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - if (!kiq->pmf || !kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > -
> > - if (amdgpu_ring_alloc(kiq_ring, kiq->pmf->unmap_queues_size)) {
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* assert preemption condition */
> > - amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, false);
> > -
> > - /* assert IB preemption, emit the trailing fence */
> > - kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues(kiq_ring, ring, PREEMPT_QUEUES_NO_UNMAP,
> > - ring->trail_fence_gpu_addr,
> > - ++ring->trail_seq);
> > - amdgpu_ring_commit(kiq_ring);
> > -
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> > -
> > - /* poll the trailing fence */
> > - for (i = 0; i < adev->usec_timeout; i++) {
> > - if (ring->trail_seq ==
> > - le32_to_cpu(*(ring->trail_fence_cpu_addr)))
> > - break;
> > - udelay(1);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (i >= adev->usec_timeout) {
> > - r = -EINVAL;
> > - DRM_ERROR("ring %d failed to preempt ib\n", ring->idx);
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* deassert preemption condition */
> > - amdgpu_ring_set_preempt_cond_exec(ring, true);
> > - return r;
> > -}
> > -
> > static void gfx_v12_0_ring_emit_rreg(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint32_t reg,
> > uint32_t reg_val_offs)
> > {
> > @@ -5539,7 +5489,7 @@ static const struct amdgpu_ring_funcs gfx_v12_0_ring_funcs_gfx = {
> > .pad_ib = amdgpu_ring_generic_pad_ib,
> > .emit_cntxcntl = gfx_v12_0_ring_emit_cntxcntl,
> > .init_cond_exec = gfx_v12_0_ring_emit_init_cond_exec,
> > - .preempt_ib = gfx_v12_0_ring_preempt_ib,
> > + .preempt_ib = amdgpu_gfx_ring_preempt_ib,
> > .emit_wreg = gfx_v12_0_ring_emit_wreg,
> > .emit_reg_wait = gfx_v12_0_ring_emit_reg_wait,
> > .emit_reg_write_reg_wait = gfx_v12_0_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait,
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 20:03 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: deduplicate ring preempt ib function Leonardo Cesar
2026-04-22 6:58 ` Christian König
2026-04-22 12:55 ` Alex Deucher [this message]
2026-04-22 21:52 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-22 21:52 ` Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADnq5_MGRpNE8Ge_5=w5mQDJivdS2Wt_2LD=dR-mrWH89Yc-0A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=leonardocesar@usp.br \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox