public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: dt-bindings: misc: qcom,fastrpc: Add Maili FastRPC compatible
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:12:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-overall-20260602-fastrpc-v2-1-67a55e22427b@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602-fastrpc-v2-1-67a55e22427b@oss.qualcomm.com>

Overall Series Review

Subject: dt-bindings: misc: qcom,fastrpc: Add Maili FastRPC compatible
Author: Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com>
Patches: 1
Reviewed: 2026-06-04T13:12:22.346708

---

This is a single-patch series adding a new compatible string (`qcom,maili-fastrpc`) to the Qualcomm FastRPC device tree binding. The patch is trivial and straightforward — it adds a new SoC-specific compatible that falls back to the existing `qcom,kaanapali-fastrpc` compatible, following the established pattern in the binding.

The change is correct and properly placed in alphabetical order within the enum list. No functional concerns.

However, there is a discrepancy between the **patch base** and the **current drm-next tree**: the binding on drm-next (shown above) only has `qcom,glymur-fastrpc` in the inner enum (lines 27-28), while the patch context shows both `qcom,glymur-fastrpc` and `qcom,hawi-fastrpc`. This means the patch is based on a tree that already includes the `qcom,hawi-fastrpc` addition (likely already queued elsewhere), which explains why it didn't apply cleanly. This is not a problem with the patch itself — it just needs to be applied on top of the tree that includes the `hawi` entry.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04  3:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-02  6:51 [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: misc: qcom,fastrpc: Add Maili FastRPC compatible Yijie Yang
2026-06-04  3:12 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-06-04  3:12 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-25  6:21 [PATCH] " Yijie Yang
2026-05-25  6:43 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-25  6:43 ` Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=review-overall-20260602-fastrpc-v2-1-67a55e22427b@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=claude-review@example.com \
    --cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox