Claude review: drm/bridge: chipone-icn6211: remove bridge when chipone_dsi_host_attach fails

[Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>]

Patch Review

**Correctness: Good.** The fix is correct. Looking at the existing code, `chipone_dsi_probe()` (line 713) already handles the equivalent error path for the DSI probe:

```c
ret = chipone_dsi_attach(icn);
if (ret)
    drm_bridge_remove(&icn->bridge);

return ret;
```

The `chipone_i2c_probe()` function was missing the same cleanup pattern. The patch correctly adds `drm_bridge_remove()` on the `chipone_dsi_host_attach()` failure path, making the two probe functions consistent.

**Style nit:** The commit message subject line is fine, but the body could be improved. It currently reads:

> when chipone_dsi_host_attach fails in chipone_i2c_probe remove drm
> bridge before return

This lacks proper capitalization and punctuation. A better version would be:

> When chipone_dsi_host_attach() fails in chipone_i2c_probe(), the
> bridge added by drm_bridge_add() is not removed, leaving a stale
> bridge registered. Add the missing drm_bridge_remove() call to the
> error path.

Also, adding a `Fixes:` tag referencing the commit that introduced `chipone_i2c_probe()` would be appropriate for a bugfix like this, as it helps with stable backporting.

**Code style nit:** There should be a blank line before `return ret;` to separate the error-handling block from the return, matching the style in `chipone_dsi_probe()` (line 739):

```c
	ret = chipone_dsi_host_attach(icn);
	if (ret)
		drm_bridge_remove(&icn->bridge);
+
	return ret;
```

**Overall: The fix is correct and should be accepted, ideally with the commit message improvements and `Fixes:` tag added.**

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer