From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/panthor: Split register definitions by components
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:28:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch2-20260427155934.416502-3-karunika.choo@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427155934.416502-3-karunika.choo@arm.com>
Patch Review
Creates `panthor_gpu_regs.h`, `panthor_fw_regs.h`, `panthor_mmu_regs.h`, and `panthor_pwr_regs.h` from the monolithic `panthor_regs.h`, which is then deleted. Each source file's include is updated accordingly. The register definitions are moved verbatim.
No issues. Clean split.
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 15:59 [PATCH v3 0/8] drm/panthor: Localize register access by component Karunika Choo
2026-04-27 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] drm/panthor: Pass an iomem pointer to GPU register access helpers Karunika Choo
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-27 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] drm/panthor: Split register definitions by components Karunika Choo
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-04-27 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] drm/panthor: Replace cross-component register accesses with helpers Karunika Choo
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-27 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/panthor: Store IRQ register base iomem pointer in panthor_irq Karunika Choo
2026-04-27 17:34 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-27 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/panthor: Use a local iomem base for GPU registers Karunika Choo
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-27 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] drm/panthor: Use a local iomem base for PWR registers Karunika Choo
2026-04-27 17:37 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-27 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/panthor: Use a local iomem base for firmware control registers Karunika Choo
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-27 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/panthor: Use a local iomem base for MMU AS registers Karunika Choo
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-28 4:28 ` Claude review: drm/panthor: Localize register access by component Claude Code Review Bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-12 14:29 [PATCH v2 0/8] " Karunika Choo
2026-04-12 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/panthor: Split register definitions by components Karunika Choo
2026-04-13 9:05 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-04-10 16:46 [PATCH 0/8] drm/panthor: Localize register access by component Karunika Choo
2026-04-10 16:46 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/panthor: Split register definitions by components Karunika Choo
2026-04-11 23:38 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=review-patch2-20260427155934.416502-3-karunika.choo@arm.com \
--to=claude-review@example.com \
--cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox