From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/vmwgfx: Check vrefresh in drm_mode_setcrtc.
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 10:17:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch2-20260514224819.3631763-3-maaz.mombasawala@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514224819.3631763-3-maaz.mombasawala@broadcom.com>
Patch Review
**Good fix for missing mode_valid callback.** The `drm_mode_config_funcs.mode_valid` callback is invoked from `drm_mode_setcrtc` but was not previously set for vmwgfx, meaning modes that only go through the legacy setcrtc path bypassed validation.
**Duplicated validation logic:** The new `vmw_kms_config_mode_valid()` duplicates a significant portion of the checks from `vmw_stdu_connector_mode_valid()` (size validation, memory checks, vrefresh). The stdu connector path checks additional constraints (stdu_max_width/height, max_mob_pages, max_mob_size) that the new config-level callback does not. This is reasonable since the config-level check applies to all display units (sou, ldu, stdu), but it would be worth a comment noting the relationship between the two validation levels.
**GPU_TILE_SIZE move is correct.** Moving the `#define GPU_TILE_SIZE 64` from `vmwgfx_stdu.c` to `vmwgfx_kms.h` makes sense since it's now used in `vmwgfx_kms.c` as well.
**vrefresh check added to stdu connector callback too** — good for consistency, covering both the atomic (connector mode_valid) and legacy (config mode_valid) paths.
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 22:48 [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix some issues from igt runs Maaz Mombasawala
2026-05-14 22:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/vmwgfx: Add some checks to vmw_cursor_plane_atomic_update Maaz Mombasawala
2026-05-16 0:17 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-14 22:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/vmwgfx: Check vrefresh in drm_mode_setcrtc Maaz Mombasawala
2026-05-16 0:17 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-05-14 22:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/vmwgfx: Reserve ttm object before resv usage Maaz Mombasawala
2026-05-16 0:17 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-14 22:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/vmwgfx: Change ttm refs for dumb buffers Maaz Mombasawala
2026-05-15 5:49 ` Zack Rusin
2026-05-16 0:17 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-14 22:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/vmwgfx: Remove duplicates in vmwgfx_bo.h Maaz Mombasawala
2026-05-16 0:17 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-16 0:17 ` Claude review: Fix some issues from igt runs Claude Code Review Bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-12 0:27 [PATCH v2 0/5] " Maaz Mombasawala
2026-05-12 0:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/vmwgfx: Check vrefresh in drm_mode_setcrtc Maaz Mombasawala
2026-05-16 4:26 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=review-patch2-20260514224819.3631763-3-maaz.mombasawala@broadcom.com \
--to=claude-review@example.com \
--cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox