public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/exec, drm/xe, drm/amdgpu: Add an accessor for struct drm_exec::ticket
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:52:58 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch5-20260331092023.81616-6-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331092023.81616-6-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>

Patch Review

**Bug: The amdkfd changes won't compile.**

In `amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c`, `exec` is declared as `struct drm_exec exec;` (a local struct, not a pointer). The patch changes:

```c
-	ret = process_validate_vms(process_info, &exec.ticket);
+	ret = process_validate_vms(process_info, drm_exec_ticket(exec));
```

Since `drm_exec_ticket()` takes `struct drm_exec *`, this should be `drm_exec_ticket(&exec)`. The same bug appears on both call sites at lines 976 and 985 of the diff. This will cause a type mismatch compile error.

The `amdgpu_cs.c` changes use `drm_exec_ticket(&p->exec)` which is correct (taking address of a struct member).

The `xe_validation.c` changes use `drm_exec_ticket(exec)` where `exec` is already a `struct drm_exec *` parameter — correct.

The accessor itself is fine:
```c
static inline struct ww_acquire_ctx *drm_exec_ticket(struct drm_exec *exec)
{
	return &exec->ticket;
}
```

**Summary for patch 5:** Fix the two `drm_exec_ticket(exec)` calls in `amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c` to `drm_exec_ticket(&exec)`.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31  9:20 [PATCH 0/5] drm/exec: drm_exec polishing Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/exec: Remove the index parameter from drm_exec_for_each_locked_obj[_reverse] Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:29   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 21:52   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/msm: Remove abuse of drm_exec internals Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:30   ` Christian König
2026-03-31  9:36   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 19:08   ` Rob Clark
2026-03-31 19:52     ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31 20:39       ` Rob Clark
2026-03-31 21:52   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/exec: Make the drm_exec_until_all_locked() macro more readable Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:39   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 11:03     ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31 21:52   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/exec, drm/xe: Avoid abusing the drm_exec retry pointer Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:44   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 10:13     ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31 11:09       ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31 11:59       ` Christian König
2026-03-31 21:52   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31  9:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/exec, drm/xe, drm/amdgpu: Add an accessor for struct drm_exec::ticket Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31  9:46   ` Christian König
2026-03-31 10:18     ` Thomas Hellström
2026-03-31 21:46   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-31 21:52   ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-03-31 21:52 ` Claude review: drm/exec: drm_exec polishing Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=review-patch5-20260331092023.81616-6-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --to=claude-review@example.com \
    --cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox