* [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: remove duplicated code in gfx_v11 and gfx_v12
@ 2026-04-29 17:36 Ulisses Paixao
2026-04-30 6:21 ` Christian König
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ulisses Paixao @ 2026-04-29 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, airlied, simona
Cc: Ulisses Paixao, Felipe Sousa, amd-gfx, dri-devel
The functions gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault and gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault
are identical. This patch replaces them with a single implementation in
amdgpu_gfx, called amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault, to reduce code
duplication.
Signed-off-by: Ulisses Paixao <ulissespaixao@usp.br>
Co-developed-by: Felipe Sousa <felipesousa@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Sousa <felipesousa@usp.br>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c | 43 ++---------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c | 43 ++---------------------
4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
index b8ca87669..c8d769cb0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
@@ -830,6 +830,52 @@ int amdgpu_gfx_enable_kgq(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id)
return r;
}
+/**
+ * amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault - Handle privileged instruction fault
+ *
+ * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
+ * @entry: interrupt vector entry from the hardware
+ *
+ * This function handles privileged instruction faults by identifying
+ * the faulty ring (gfx or compute) and triggering a scheduler fault.
+ */
+void amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+ struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
+{
+ u8 me_id, pipe_id, queue_id;
+ struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
+ int i;
+
+ me_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x0c) >> 2;
+ pipe_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x03) >> 0;
+ queue_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x70) >> 4;
+
+ if (!adev->gfx.disable_kq) {
+ switch (me_id) {
+ case 0:
+ for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings; i++) {
+ ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[i];
+ if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
+ ring->queue == queue_id)
+ drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
+ }
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ case 2:
+ for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
+ ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
+ if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
+ ring->queue == queue_id)
+ drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ BUG();
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static void amdgpu_gfx_do_off_ctrl(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable,
bool no_delay)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
index a0cf0a3b4..5655af43d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
@@ -611,6 +611,8 @@ bool amdgpu_gfx_is_high_priority_graphics_queue(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
bool amdgpu_gfx_is_me_queue_enabled(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int me,
int pipe, int queue);
+void amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+ struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry);
void amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable);
void amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl_immediate(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable);
int amdgpu_get_gfx_off_status(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t *value);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
index 2c6f1e25c..da869f928 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
@@ -6684,49 +6684,12 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_set_priv_inst_fault_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
return 0;
}
-static void gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
- struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
-{
- u8 me_id, pipe_id, queue_id;
- struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
- int i;
-
- me_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x0c) >> 2;
- pipe_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x03) >> 0;
- queue_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x70) >> 4;
-
- if (!adev->gfx.disable_kq) {
- switch (me_id) {
- case 0:
- for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings; i++) {
- ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[i];
- if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
- ring->queue == queue_id)
- drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
- }
- break;
- case 1:
- case 2:
- for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
- ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
- if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
- ring->queue == queue_id)
- drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
- }
- break;
- default:
- BUG();
- break;
- }
- }
-}
-
static int gfx_v11_0_priv_reg_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct amdgpu_irq_src *source,
struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
{
DRM_ERROR("Illegal register access in command stream\n");
- gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
+ amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
return 0;
}
@@ -6735,7 +6698,7 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_bad_op_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
{
DRM_ERROR("Illegal opcode in command stream\n");
- gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
+ amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
return 0;
}
@@ -6744,7 +6707,7 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_priv_inst_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
{
DRM_ERROR("Illegal instruction in command stream\n");
- gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
+ amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
index 6baac533a..883878e23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
@@ -5015,49 +5015,12 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_set_priv_inst_fault_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
return 0;
}
-static void gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
- struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
-{
- u8 me_id, pipe_id, queue_id;
- struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
- int i;
-
- me_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x0c) >> 2;
- pipe_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x03) >> 0;
- queue_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x70) >> 4;
-
- if (!adev->gfx.disable_kq) {
- switch (me_id) {
- case 0:
- for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings; i++) {
- ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[i];
- if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
- ring->queue == queue_id)
- drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
- }
- break;
- case 1:
- case 2:
- for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
- ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
- if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
- ring->queue == queue_id)
- drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
- }
- break;
- default:
- BUG();
- break;
- }
- }
-}
-
static int gfx_v12_0_priv_reg_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct amdgpu_irq_src *source,
struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
{
DRM_ERROR("Illegal register access in command stream\n");
- gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
+ amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
return 0;
}
@@ -5066,7 +5029,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_bad_op_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
{
DRM_ERROR("Illegal opcode in command stream\n");
- gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
+ amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
return 0;
}
@@ -5075,7 +5038,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_priv_inst_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
{
DRM_ERROR("Illegal instruction in command stream\n");
- gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
+ amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: remove duplicated code in gfx_v11 and gfx_v12
2026-04-29 17:36 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: remove duplicated code in gfx_v11 and gfx_v12 Ulisses Paixao
@ 2026-04-30 6:21 ` Christian König
2026-05-05 0:53 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-05 0:53 ` Claude Code Review Bot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2026-04-30 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulisses Paixao, alexander.deucher, airlied, simona
Cc: Felipe Sousa, amd-gfx, dri-devel
On 4/29/26 19:36, Ulisses Paixao wrote:
> [Sie erhalten nicht häufig E-Mails von ulissespaixao@usp.br. Weitere Informationen, warum dies wichtig ist, finden Sie unter https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> The functions gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault and gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault
> are identical. This patch replaces them with a single implementation in
> amdgpu_gfx, called amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault, to reduce code
> duplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulisses Paixao <ulissespaixao@usp.br>
> Co-developed-by: Felipe Sousa <felipesousa@usp.br>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Sousa <felipesousa@usp.br>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c | 43 ++---------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c | 43 ++---------------------
> 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> index b8ca87669..c8d769cb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
> @@ -830,6 +830,52 @@ int amdgpu_gfx_enable_kgq(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id)
> return r;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault - Handle privileged instruction fault
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @entry: interrupt vector entry from the hardware
> + *
> + * This function handles privileged instruction faults by identifying
> + * the faulty ring (gfx or compute) and triggering a scheduler fault.
> + */
> +void amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> +{
> + u8 me_id, pipe_id, queue_id;
> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
> + int i;
> +
> + me_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x0c) >> 2;
> + pipe_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x03) >> 0;
> + queue_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x70) >> 4;
Even when they are identical on gfx11 and gfx12 this decoding here is HW specific and doesn't belong here.
> +
> + if (!adev->gfx.disable_kq) {
That check can probably be removed. Both num_gfx_rings and num_compute_rings should be zero in that case.
> + switch (me_id) {
> + case 0:
> + for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings; i++) {
> + ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[i];
> + if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
> + ring->queue == queue_id)
> + drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
> + }
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + case 2:
> + for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
> + ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
> + if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
> + ring->queue == queue_id)
> + drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + BUG();
> + break;
> + }
> + }
This part can be moved into amdgpu_gfx. But I would remove the switch (me_id) part and just go over all gfx and compute rings to search for the matching me and pipe.
Regards,
Christian.
> +}
> +
> static void amdgpu_gfx_do_off_ctrl(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable,
> bool no_delay)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> index a0cf0a3b4..5655af43d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> @@ -611,6 +611,8 @@ bool amdgpu_gfx_is_high_priority_graphics_queue(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
> bool amdgpu_gfx_is_me_queue_enabled(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int me,
> int pipe, int queue);
> +void amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry);
> void amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable);
> void amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl_immediate(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable);
> int amdgpu_get_gfx_off_status(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t *value);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> index 2c6f1e25c..da869f928 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> @@ -6684,49 +6684,12 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_set_priv_inst_fault_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> - struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> -{
> - u8 me_id, pipe_id, queue_id;
> - struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
> - int i;
> -
> - me_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x0c) >> 2;
> - pipe_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x03) >> 0;
> - queue_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x70) >> 4;
> -
> - if (!adev->gfx.disable_kq) {
> - switch (me_id) {
> - case 0:
> - for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings; i++) {
> - ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[i];
> - if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
> - ring->queue == queue_id)
> - drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
> - }
> - break;
> - case 1:
> - case 2:
> - for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
> - ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
> - if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
> - ring->queue == queue_id)
> - drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
> - }
> - break;
> - default:
> - BUG();
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> -}
> -
> static int gfx_v11_0_priv_reg_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_irq_src *source,
> struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> {
> DRM_ERROR("Illegal register access in command stream\n");
> - gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> + amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -6735,7 +6698,7 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_bad_op_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> {
> DRM_ERROR("Illegal opcode in command stream\n");
> - gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> + amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -6744,7 +6707,7 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_priv_inst_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> {
> DRM_ERROR("Illegal instruction in command stream\n");
> - gfx_v11_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> + amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> index 6baac533a..883878e23 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> @@ -5015,49 +5015,12 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_set_priv_inst_fault_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> - struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> -{
> - u8 me_id, pipe_id, queue_id;
> - struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
> - int i;
> -
> - me_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x0c) >> 2;
> - pipe_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x03) >> 0;
> - queue_id = (entry->ring_id & 0x70) >> 4;
> -
> - if (!adev->gfx.disable_kq) {
> - switch (me_id) {
> - case 0:
> - for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings; i++) {
> - ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[i];
> - if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
> - ring->queue == queue_id)
> - drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
> - }
> - break;
> - case 1:
> - case 2:
> - for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) {
> - ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
> - if (ring->me == me_id && ring->pipe == pipe_id &&
> - ring->queue == queue_id)
> - drm_sched_fault(&ring->sched);
> - }
> - break;
> - default:
> - BUG();
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> -}
> -
> static int gfx_v12_0_priv_reg_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_irq_src *source,
> struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> {
> DRM_ERROR("Illegal register access in command stream\n");
> - gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> + amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -5066,7 +5029,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_bad_op_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> {
> DRM_ERROR("Illegal opcode in command stream\n");
> - gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> + amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -5075,7 +5038,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_priv_inst_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
> {
> DRM_ERROR("Illegal instruction in command stream\n");
> - gfx_v12_0_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> + amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault(adev, entry);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Claude review: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: remove duplicated code in gfx_v11 and gfx_v12
2026-04-30 6:21 ` Christian König
@ 2026-05-05 0:53 ` Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-05 0:53 ` Claude Code Review Bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Claude Code Review Bot @ 2026-05-05 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel-reviews
Overall Series Review
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: remove duplicated code in gfx_v11 and gfx_v12
Author: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Patches: 2
Reviewed: 2026-05-05T10:53:47.373114
---
This is a single-patch cleanup that consolidates identical `handle_priv_fault` implementations from `gfx_v11_0.c` and `gfx_v12_0.c` into a shared `amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault()` in `amdgpu_gfx.c`. The consolidation is correct — I verified that the two original functions are byte-for-byte identical in the current tree. The mechanical transformation is clean.
However, there are a few issues:
1. **`Co-developed-by` tag ordering is wrong** — kernel documentation requires each `Co-developed-by` to be immediately followed by its corresponding `Signed-off-by`, with the submitter's `Signed-off-by` last.
2. **`BUG()` in the default case** — this is inherited from the original code, but consolidating into shared infrastructure is a good opportunity to fix it. `BUG()` in an interrupt handler will panic the kernel. The newer `gfx_v12_1` already uses `dev_dbg()` for this case instead.
3. **Incomplete consolidation** — `gfx_v10_0.c` has a nearly identical implementation (differing only in lacking the `disable_kq` guard), and `gfx_v12_1.c` has a related variant. At minimum, the commit message should acknowledge why these were excluded.
4. **Minor style issues** in the kernel-doc comment.
Verdict: Good idea, needs a v2 to fix the tag ordering and ideally address the `BUG()` concern.
---
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Claude review: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: remove duplicated code in gfx_v11 and gfx_v12
2026-04-30 6:21 ` Christian König
2026-05-05 0:53 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
@ 2026-05-05 0:53 ` Claude Code Review Bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Claude Code Review Bot @ 2026-05-05 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel-reviews
Patch Review
**Tag ordering (must fix):**
The current trailer block is:
```
Signed-off-by: Ulisses Paixao <ulissespaixao@usp.br>
Co-developed-by: Felipe Sousa <felipesousa@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Sousa <felipesousa@usp.br>
```
Per [Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst](https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by), every `Co-developed-by:` must be immediately followed by the corresponding `Signed-off-by:`, and the submitter's `Signed-off-by:` must be last. The correct ordering is:
```
Co-developed-by: Felipe Sousa <felipesousa@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Sousa <felipesousa@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Ulisses Paixao <ulissespaixao@usp.br>
```
**`BUG()` in default case (should fix):**
```c
default:
BUG();
break;
```
This is an interrupt handler context. `BUG()` will panic the kernel, which is disproportionate for receiving an unexpected `me_id` value. The newer `gfx_v12_1_handle_priv_fault` already handles this more gracefully:
```c
default:
dev_dbg(adev->dev, "Unexpected me %d in priv_fault\n", me_id);
break;
```
Since this function is being promoted to shared infrastructure, this is the right time to replace `BUG()` with `WARN_ONCE()` or `dev_err()` — something that logs the problem without crashing the machine.
**Incomplete consolidation (minor, worth mentioning in commit message):**
The tree also has `handle_priv_fault` in:
- `gfx_v10_0.c` — nearly identical, only missing the `!adev->gfx.disable_kq` guard
- `gfx_v12_1.c` — different (has `xcc_id` / multi-XCC logic, no gfx ring case)
The commit message should mention why these aren't included. For `gfx_v10_0`, the `disable_kq` guard is likely just a missing backport — wrapping it in the same shared function (which has the guard) might even be a bugfix. Worth investigating.
**Kernel-doc comment trailing whitespace:**
```c
+ * amdgpu_gfx_handle_priv_fault - Handle privileged instruction fault
+ *
+ * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
+ * @entry: interrupt vector entry from the hardware
+ *
```
Lines 3 and 5 of the doc comment (the blank lines marked with ` * `) have trailing whitespace after the `*`. These should be just ` *` with no trailing space. Some CI checks flag this.
**Code correctness:**
The consolidated function itself is a faithful copy of the originals. The extraction into `amdgpu_gfx.c` is placed logically after `amdgpu_gfx_enable_kgq()` near other queue-management code. The declaration in `amdgpu_gfx.h` is placed alphabetically near related functions. The callers in both `gfx_v11_0.c` and `gfx_v12_0.c` are updated correctly across all three IRQ handlers (`priv_reg_irq`, `bad_op_irq`, `priv_inst_irq`).
No functional change for v11 and v12 — this is a clean refactor.
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-05 0:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-29 17:36 [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: remove duplicated code in gfx_v11 and gfx_v12 Ulisses Paixao
2026-04-30 6:21 ` Christian König
2026-05-05 0:53 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-05 0:53 ` Claude Code Review Bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox