public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <david@davidgow.net>, Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
	Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
Cc: brgl@kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/xe/i2c: use platform_device_add_software_node()
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:59:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512-swnode-remove-on-dev-unreg-v5-4-0035eff63812@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512-swnode-remove-on-dev-unreg-v5-0-0035eff63812@oss.qualcomm.com>

This driver intentionally uses the fine-grained approach to creating
platform devices. It assigns a software node as the primary firmware
node of the device it creates. Ahead of improving the reference counting
of platform device software nodes, switch to the new interface that
internally uses device_add_software_node(). While at it: define a static
software node with the provided set of properties instead of allocating
it dynamically and simplify the error path.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
index 706783863d07d66b4685005d6649b3cd143ecc3b..7f4295e7dc74f112abff8427485b5c8a5ad71383 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_i2c.c
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ static const struct property_entry xe_i2c_adapter_properties[] = {
 	{ }
 };
 
+static const struct software_node xe_i2c_adapter_swnode = {
+	.properties = xe_i2c_adapter_properties,
+};
+
 static inline void xe_i2c_read_endpoint(struct xe_mmio *mmio, void *ep)
 {
 	u32 *val = ep;
@@ -96,10 +100,6 @@ static int xe_i2c_register_adapter(struct xe_i2c *i2c)
 	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
 	int ret;
 
-	fwnode = fwnode_create_software_node(xe_i2c_adapter_properties, NULL);
-	if (IS_ERR(fwnode))
-		return PTR_ERR(fwnode);
-
 	/*
 	 * Not using platform_device_register_full() here because we don't have
 	 * a handle to the platform_device before it returns. xe_i2c_notifier()
@@ -107,10 +107,12 @@ static int xe_i2c_register_adapter(struct xe_i2c *i2c)
 	 * platform_device_register_full() is done.
 	 */
 	pdev = platform_device_alloc(adapter_name, pci_dev_id(pci));
-	if (!pdev) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err_fwnode_remove;
-	}
+	if (!pdev)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = platform_device_add_software_node(pdev, &xe_i2c_adapter_swnode);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_pdev_put;
 
 	if (i2c->adapter_irq) {
 		struct resource res;
@@ -123,7 +125,6 @@ static int xe_i2c_register_adapter(struct xe_i2c *i2c)
 	}
 
 	pdev->dev.parent = i2c->drm_dev;
-	pdev->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
 	i2c->adapter_node = fwnode;
 	i2c->pdev = pdev;
 
@@ -135,8 +136,6 @@ static int xe_i2c_register_adapter(struct xe_i2c *i2c)
 
 err_pdev_put:
 	platform_device_put(pdev);
-err_fwnode_remove:
-	fwnode_remove_software_node(fwnode);
 
 	return ret;
 }

-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12 11:59 [PATCH v5 0/7] driver core: remove software node from platform devices on device release Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] platform/surface: gpe: use platform_device_register_full() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16  3:28   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] driver core: platform: make the swnode check stricter Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16  3:28   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] driver core: platform: provide platform_device_add_software_node() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 16:31   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-12 18:15     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-13 11:55     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16  3:28   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2026-05-12 16:24   ` [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/xe/i2c: use platform_device_add_software_node() Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-16  3:28   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] driver core: platform: remove software node on release() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16  3:28   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] kunit: provide kunit_software_node_register() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 15:28   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-16  3:28   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] driver core: platform: tests: add test cases for correct swnode removal Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16  3:28   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] driver core: remove software node from platform devices on device release Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-16  3:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260512-swnode-remove-on-dev-unreg-v5-4-0035eff63812@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@davidgow.net \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox