From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
David Gow <david@davidgow.net>, Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
Cc: brgl@kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 7/7] driver core: platform: tests: add test cases for correct swnode removal
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:59:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512-swnode-remove-on-dev-unreg-v5-7-0035eff63812@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512-swnode-remove-on-dev-unreg-v5-0-0035eff63812@oss.qualcomm.com>
Extend the kunit module for platform devices with test cases verifying
that the same software node can be added to platform devices repeatedly.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 168 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
index 6355a2231b741791b54eb78af42e13f31f745184..3e42c205fc935ab1dd2066e257d4ecf837c9ad79 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
+++ b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
@@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <kunit/fwnode.h>
#include <kunit/platform_device.h>
#include <kunit/resource.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/device/bus.h>
+#include <linux/fwnode.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
#define DEVICE_NAME "test"
@@ -253,9 +256,174 @@ static struct kunit_suite platform_device_match_test_suite = {
.test_cases = platform_device_match_tests,
};
+static int platform_device_swnode_test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver platform_swnode_test_driver = {
+ .probe = platform_device_swnode_test_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = DEVICE_NAME,
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct software_node platform_device_test_swnode = { };
+
+/*
+ * Check that reusing a software node works correctly. If the call to
+ * platform_device_register_full() fails after adding the secondary firmware
+ * node, the software node must be unregistered in the device's release()
+ * callback or the subsequent call to platform_device_register_full() will fail
+ * with -EBUSY due to the software node aleady having been registered.
+ */
+static void platform_device_swnode_add_twice(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+ struct fwnode_handle fwnode;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &platform_swnode_test_driver);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ fwnode_init(&fwnode, NULL);
+ pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+ .name = DEVICE_NAME,
+ .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ .fwnode = &fwnode,
+ .swnode = &platform_device_test_swnode,
+ };
+
+ pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
+
+ wait_for_device_probe();
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, device_is_bound(&pdev->dev));
+
+ platform_device_unregister(pdev);
+
+ pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
+
+ wait_for_device_probe();
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, device_is_bound(&pdev->dev));
+
+ platform_device_unregister(pdev);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check that passing a software node as the primary firmware node of the
+ * platform device does not result in it being unregistered by the call to
+ * device_remove_software_node() in its release path.
+ */
+static void platform_device_swnode_as_primary(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &platform_swnode_test_driver);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ fwnode = kunit_software_node_register(test, &platform_device_test_swnode);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, fwnode);
+
+ pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+ .name = DEVICE_NAME,
+ .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ .fwnode = fwnode,
+ };
+
+ pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
+
+ wait_for_device_probe();
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, device_is_bound(&pdev->dev));
+
+ platform_device_unregister(pdev);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, software_node_fwnode(&platform_device_test_swnode));
+}
+
+static const struct software_node platform_device_test_primary_swnode = { };
+
+/*
+ * Check that passing two software nodes to platform_device_register_full()
+ * fails.
+ */
+static void platform_device_two_swnodes(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ static const struct property_entry properties[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("foo", 42),
+ { }
+ };
+
+ struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = kunit_platform_driver_register(test, &platform_swnode_test_driver);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ fwnode = kunit_software_node_register(test, &platform_device_test_swnode);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, fwnode);
+
+ pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+ .name = DEVICE_NAME,
+ .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ .fwnode = fwnode,
+ .swnode = &platform_device_test_swnode,
+ };
+
+ pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, IS_ERR(pdev));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, PTR_ERR(pdev), -EINVAL,
+ "Expected errno == -EINVAL, got: %pe", pdev);
+
+ pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+ .name = DEVICE_NAME,
+ .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ .swnode = &platform_device_test_swnode,
+ .properties = properties,
+ };
+
+ pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, IS_ERR(pdev));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, PTR_ERR(pdev), -EINVAL,
+ "Expected errno == -EINVAL, got: %pe", pdev);
+
+ pdevinfo = (struct platform_device_info){
+ .name = DEVICE_NAME,
+ .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ .fwnode = fwnode,
+ .properties = properties,
+ };
+
+ pdev = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, IS_ERR(pdev));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, PTR_ERR(pdev), -EINVAL,
+ "Expected errno == -EINVAL, got: %pe", pdev);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case platform_device_swnode_tests[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(platform_device_swnode_add_twice),
+ KUNIT_CASE(platform_device_swnode_as_primary),
+ KUNIT_CASE(platform_device_two_swnodes),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite platform_device_swnode_test_suite = {
+ .name = "platform-device-swnode",
+ .test_cases = platform_device_swnode_tests,
+};
+
kunit_test_suites(
&platform_device_devm_test_suite,
&platform_device_match_test_suite,
+ &platform_device_swnode_test_suite,
);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test module for platform devices");
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 11:59 [PATCH v5 0/7] driver core: remove software node from platform devices on device release Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] platform/surface: gpe: use platform_device_register_full() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16 3:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] driver core: platform: make the swnode check stricter Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16 3:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] driver core: platform: provide platform_device_add_software_node() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 16:31 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-12 18:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-13 11:55 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16 3:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] drm/xe/i2c: use platform_device_add_software_node() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 16:24 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-16 3:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] driver core: platform: remove software node on release() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-16 3:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] kunit: provide kunit_software_node_register() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12 15:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-16 3:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 11:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2026-05-16 3:28 ` Claude review: driver core: platform: tests: add test cases for correct swnode removal Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-12 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] driver core: remove software node from platform devices on device release Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-16 3:28 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260512-swnode-remove-on-dev-unreg-v5-7-0035eff63812@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=david@davidgow.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox