From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: set SB_I_NOEXEC on the pseudo filesystem
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 13:54:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521-dilettanten-klarzukommen-9351cba40c06@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520214350.168689-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 02:43:50PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> The dma-buf pseudo filesystem dispenses S_ANON_INODE inodes via
> alloc_anon_inode() but never sets SB_I_NOEXEC on its superblock.
> Since commit 1e7ab6f67824 ("anon_inode: rework assertions") in 6.17,
> path_noexec() warns on exactly that combination, so an mmap() on any
> dma-buf fd trips the warning:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 121813 at fs/exec.c:118 path_noexec+0x47/0x50
> do_mmap+0x2b5/0x680
> vm_mmap_pgoff+0x129/0x210
> ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x177/0x240
> __x64_sys_mmap+0x33/0x70
>
> dma-bufs have no business being executable, which is the invariant
> that the new assertion is enforcing. Set SB_I_NOEXEC on the dmabuf
> superblock.
>
> Reproducer on a CONFIG_DEBUG_VFS=y kernel:
>
> make -C tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps
> sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap -t system
>
> The selftest allocates from /dev/dma_heap/system and mmaps the
> returned fd, which trips the warning without this patch.
>
> Fixes: 1e7ab6f67824 ("anon_inode: rework assertions")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> ---
Perfect, the asserts are paying off. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 71f37544a5c6..d86a99d7b8dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ static int dma_buf_fs_init_context(struct fs_context *fc)
> if (!ctx)
> return -ENOMEM;
> ctx->dops = &dma_buf_dentry_ops;
> + fc->s_iflags |= SB_I_NOEXEC;
While you're at it, also raise SB_I_NODEV. You're not creating any
device nodes and this is additional hardening.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 21:43 [PATCH] dma-buf: set SB_I_NOEXEC on the pseudo filesystem John Hubbard
2026-05-21 11:54 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-05-21 22:54 ` John Hubbard
2026-05-25 11:11 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-05-25 11:11 ` Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521-dilettanten-klarzukommen-9351cba40c06@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox