From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: simona@ffwll.ch, michel.daenzer@mailbox.org,
louis.chauvet@bootlin.com, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com,
jani.nikula@intel.com, mhklkml@zohomail.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
airlied@gmail.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] drm/vblank: timer: Reorganize get_vblank_timeout
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 16:08:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601141922.91498-5-tzimmermann@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601141922.91498-1-tzimmermann@suse.de>
Handle vblank->enabled in a separate branch before handling the
opposite case. Prepares the code for estimating the vblank timeout
while vblanking is disabled. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 03b07e3c2598..cecaef98aa52 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -2306,8 +2306,6 @@ bool drm_crtc_vblank_get_vblank_timeout(struct drm_crtc *crtc, ktime_t *vblank_t
struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = drm_crtc_vblank_crtc(crtc);
struct drm_vblank_crtc_timer *vtimer = &vblank->vblank_timer;
const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
- u64 cur_count;
- ktime_t cur_time;
s64 framedur_ns;
s64 activedur_ns;
@@ -2316,24 +2314,28 @@ bool drm_crtc_vblank_get_vblank_timeout(struct drm_crtc *crtc, ktime_t *vblank_t
else
mode = &crtc->hwmode;
- if (!READ_ONCE(vblank->enabled))
- return false;
+ if (READ_ONCE(vblank->enabled)) {
+ ktime_t cur_time;
+ u64 cur_count;
- /*
- * A concurrent vblank timeout could update the expires field before
- * we compare it with the vblank time. Hence we'd compare the old
- * expiry time to the new vblank time; deducing the timer had already
- * expired. Reread until we get consistent values from both fields.
- */
- do {
- cur_count = drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time(crtc, &cur_time);
- *vblank_time = READ_ONCE(vtimer->timer.node.expires);
- } while (cur_count != drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time(crtc, &cur_time));
+ /*
+ * A concurrent vblank timeout could update the expires field before
+ * we compare it with the vblank time. Hence we'd compare the old
+ * expiry time to the new vblank time; deducing the timer had already
+ * expired. Reread until we get consistent values from both fields.
+ */
+ do {
+ cur_count = drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time(crtc, &cur_time);
+ *vblank_time = READ_ONCE(vtimer->timer.node.expires);
+ } while (cur_count != drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time(crtc, &cur_time));
- if (drm_WARN_ON(dev, !ktime_compare(*vblank_time, cur_time)))
- return false; /* Already expired */
+ if (drm_WARN_ON(dev, !ktime_compare(*vblank_time, cur_time)))
+ return false; /* already expired */
- framedur_ns = vblank->framedur_ns;
+ framedur_ns = vblank->framedur_ns;
+ } else {
+ return false;
+ }
/*
* To prevent races we rolled the hrtimer forward before we did any
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 14:08 [PATCH 0/7] drm/vblank: timer: Fix timestamps and improve reliabilty Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-01 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/vblank: timer: Return success status from get_vblank_timeout Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-04 4:03 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-01 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/vblank: timer: Fix timestamp calculation Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-01 16:24 ` Michel Dänzer
2026-06-01 17:30 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-02 14:14 ` Michel Dänzer
2026-06-04 4:03 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-01 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/vblank: timer: Use absolute timer since boot Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-04 4:03 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-01 14:08 ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2026-06-04 4:03 ` Claude review: drm/vblank: timer: Reorganize get_vblank_timeout Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-01 14:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/vblank: timer: Estimate vblank timeout if timer is disabled Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-04 4:03 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-01 14:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/vblank: timer: Verify that expiry time is in the future Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-04 4:03 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-01 14:08 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/vblank: timer: Avoid reading the vblank time unnecessarily Thomas Zimmermann
2026-06-04 4:04 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-04 4:03 ` Claude review: drm/vblank: timer: Fix timestamps and improve reliabilty Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260601141922.91498-5-tzimmermann@suse.de \
--to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=louis.chauvet@bootlin.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mhklkml@zohomail.com \
--cc=michel.daenzer@mailbox.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox