public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Chia-Lin Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] libfs: set SB_I_NOEXEC and SB_I_NODEV in init_pseudo()
Date: Wed,  3 Jun 2026 19:53:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604025315.245910-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> (raw)

This began as a one-line dma-buf fix for a path_noexec() warning added
by commit 1e7ab6f67824 ("anon_inode: rework assertions"). Christoph
pointed out that the fix belongs higher up: a pseudo filesystem has no
reason not to set SB_I_NOEXEC by default. This series does that.

  * Patch 1 sets both flags in init_pseudo(), so every pseudo
    filesystem gets them. This is the only patch that changes a flag,
    and the only one with Fixes:/Cc: stable.

  * Patch 2 drops the assignments that are now redundant in the callers
    that set them by hand.

Most callers already set one or both flags. I audited every
init_pseudo() caller. Here is what patch 1 actually changes for each.
The only visible effect is on dma-buf, where SB_I_NOEXEC silences the
warning. SB_I_NODEV is never consulted on these SB_NOUSER mounts, and
none of the callers that gain SB_I_NOEXEC are executed from.

  caller                       had        patch 1 adds
  ---------------------------  --------   --------------
  fs/anon_inodes.c             both       nothing new
  mm/secretmem.c               both       nothing new
  virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c       both       nothing new
  fs/nsfs.c                    both       nothing new
  fs/pidfs.c                   both       nothing new
  fs/aio.c                     NOEXEC     NODEV
  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  net/socket.c                 neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  fs/pipe.c                    neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  kernel/resource.c            neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  fs/erofs/super.c             neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  fs/btrfs/tests/...           neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c     neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c    neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  drivers/dax/super.c          neither    NOEXEC + NODEV
  block/bdev.c                 neither    NOEXEC + NODEV

John Hubbard (2):
  libfs: set SB_I_NOEXEC and SB_I_NODEV by default in init_pseudo()
  libfs: drop redundant SB_I_NOEXEC/SB_I_NODEV in init_pseudo() callers

 fs/aio.c               | 1 -
 fs/anon_inodes.c       | 2 --
 fs/libfs.c             | 1 +
 fs/nsfs.c              | 1 -
 fs/pidfs.c             | 2 --
 mm/secretmem.c         | 2 --
 virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 2 --
 7 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)


base-commit: ba3e43a9e601636f5edb54e259a74f96ca3b8fd8
-- 
2.54.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-04  2:53 John Hubbard [this message]
2026-06-04  2:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] libfs: set SB_I_NOEXEC and SB_I_NODEV by default in init_pseudo() John Hubbard
2026-06-04 20:45   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-04  2:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] libfs: drop redundant SB_I_NOEXEC/SB_I_NODEV in init_pseudo() callers John Hubbard
2026-06-04 20:45   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-06-04 20:45 ` Claude review: libfs: set SB_I_NOEXEC and SB_I_NODEV in init_pseudo() Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260604025315.245910-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox