From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/vkms: Constify struct configfs_item_operations and configfs_group_operations
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 07:16:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-overall-ade89ec366460754dd1746dd8001afb53cfaffbf.1779712234.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ade89ec366460754dd1746dd8001afb53cfaffbf.1779712234.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Overall Series Review
Subject: drm/vkms: Constify struct configfs_item_operations and configfs_group_operations
Author: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Patches: 1
Reviewed: 2026-05-26T07:16:38.236375
---
This is a single-patch cleanup that adds `const` qualifiers to all `struct configfs_item_operations` and `struct configfs_group_operations` instances in the vkms configfs driver. The change is trivially correct, well-motivated, and a net positive for security and code hygiene.
The `config_item_type` structure in `include/linux/configfs.h:67-68` already declares these fields as `const` pointers:
```c
const struct configfs_item_operations *ct_item_ops;
const struct configfs_group_operations *ct_group_ops;
```
So the framework explicitly expects and supports `const` here. Other subsystems (e.g., USB gadget configfs) already use `const` for these structures. The commit message is clear, includes before/after size data showing the expected text/data shift (~992 bytes moved from writable data to read-only text), and notes it was compile-tested.
**Verdict: Patch looks good. No issues found.**
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 12:30 [PATCH] drm/vkms: Constify struct configfs_item_operations and configfs_group_operations Christophe JAILLET
2026-05-25 21:16 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-05-25 21:16 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=review-overall-ade89ec366460754dd1746dd8001afb53cfaffbf.1779712234.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--to=claude-review@example.com \
--cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox