public inbox for drm-ai-reviews@public-inbox.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/amdgpu: fix sleeping allocation under spinlock in PASID IDR
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:36:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch1-20260330053025.19203-2-mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330053025.19203-2-mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>

Patch Review

**Status: Good**

The fix uses the standard `idr_preload()` / `GFP_NOWAIT` pattern:

```c
+	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
 	spin_lock(&amdgpu_pasid_idr_lock);
 	pasid = idr_alloc_cyclic(&amdgpu_pasid_idr, NULL, 1,
-				 1U << bits, GFP_KERNEL);
+				 1U << bits, GFP_NOWAIT);
 	spin_unlock(&amdgpu_pasid_idr_lock);
+	idr_preload_end();
```

This is the textbook kernel approach: `idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL)` pre-allocates radix-tree nodes in sleepable context with preemption disabled, then `GFP_NOWAIT` inside the spinlock draws from the preloaded pool. `idr_preload_end()` re-enables preemption after the lock is released.

The ordering is correct: `idr_preload()` before `spin_lock()`, and `idr_preload_end()` after `spin_unlock()`. No issues.

Note: The Fixes: tag references `14b81abe7bdc` while the cover letter mentions `8f1de51f49be`. Both should refer to the same commit that introduced the IDR conversion. The cover letter and patch 2 use `8f1de51f49be` — the discrepancy in the Fixes: tag on patch 1 (`14b81abe7bdc`) should be verified. If these are different commits, the correct one to cite is whichever actually introduced `idr_alloc_cyclic()` with `GFP_KERNEL` under the spinlock.

---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-30  5:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/amdgpu: fix locking issues in PASID IDR management Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-03-30  5:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/amdgpu: fix sleeping allocation under spinlock in PASID IDR Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-03-31  7:36   ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-03-30  5:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use spin_lock_irqsave for PASID IDR lock Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-03-31  7:36   ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31  7:36 ` Claude review: drm/amdgpu: fix locking issues in PASID IDR management Claude Code Review Bot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-28 21:39 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix sleeping allocation under spinlock in PASID IDR Mikhail Gavrilov
2026-03-31  7:50 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31  7:50 ` Claude Code Review Bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=review-patch1-20260330053025.19203-2-mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com \
    --to=claude-review@example.com \
    --cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox