From: Claude Code Review Bot <claude-review@example.com>
To: dri-devel-reviews@example.com
Subject: Claude review: drm/bridge: waveshare-dsi: support DSI LCD kits with LVDS panels
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:39:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <review-patch2-20260331-ws-lcd-v2-2-a1add63b6eb6@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331-ws-lcd-v2-2-a1add63b6eb6@oss.qualcomm.com>
Patch Review
The approach of using `i2c_get_match_data()` with the connector type stored in `.data` is clean and follows established kernel patterns.
```c
ws->bridge.type = (uintptr_t)i2c_get_match_data(i2c);
```
This is correct -- `i2c_get_match_data()` returns `const void *`, and casting to `uintptr_t` for the enum value is standard practice. The two OF table entries are well-formed.
One question for the author: the commit message says "The only difference with the existing waveshare,dsi2dpi is the bridge's output type (LVDS vs DPI)." -- is that truly the only difference? The ICN6211 (DSI2DPI) and ICN6202 (DSI2LVDS) are different chips. The probe function writes to registers `0xc0`, `0xc2`, `0xac` -- are those register writes valid/harmless for the ICN6202 as well, or is the bridge firmware handling those registers independently? The cover letter says the bridges are "completely handled by the board itself" so this is probably fine, but worth confirming.
No code issues.
---
Generated by Claude Code Patch Reviewer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 15:44 [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/panel: simple: add Waveshare LCD panels Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-31 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: display: waveshare,dsp2dpi: describe DSI2LVDS setup Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-31 21:39 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/bridge: waveshare-dsi: support DSI LCD kits with LVDS panels Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-31 21:39 ` Claude Code Review Bot [this message]
2026-03-31 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: add Waveshare LCD panels Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-31 21:39 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/panel: simple: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-31 21:39 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-31 21:39 ` Claude Code Review Bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-12 17:32 [PATCH v3 0/2] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-04-12 17:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/bridge: waveshare-dsi: support DSI LCD kits with LVDS panels Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-04-13 8:54 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
2026-03-30 13:25 [PATCH 0/4] drm/panel: simple: add Waveshare LCD panels Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-30 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/bridge: waveshare-dsi: support DSI LCD kits with LVDS panels Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-31 7:17 ` Claude review: " Claude Code Review Bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=review-patch2-20260331-ws-lcd-v2-2-a1add63b6eb6@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=claude-review@example.com \
--cc=dri-devel-reviews@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox